Qualitative Communication Research Methods

Com 473 BaldwinCommunicationIllinois State University

Updated 10/12/09

 

Interviews

In-Class Assignment:  Interviews

Baldwin—COM 473

 

1.  Decide a topic that is interesting to all members of the group (do this part quickly!). If you cannot think of one, use the scenario at the bottom of the page.

 

2.  Decide the TYPE OF INTERVIEWS you will use. Why is this type the most appropriate for the situation.

 

3.  Discuss any LOGISTICS of the interviews, based on what you have read in the texts for class (e.g., where, when, length, tape record?)

 

 4. Write out a SAMPLE OF THE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS you will use (from 1 to 3 questions). If you have time, develop probes to follow up the questions. See if the class can guess what type of question it is!

 

5.  If you could use one other method with or instead of interviews (or the type of interview you have chosen!), what would it be, and what would be the differences and similarities in types of data you obtain and the types of claims you would be able to make from your data?

 

Sample Research Scenario

You have been signed on as part of an intercultural communication class to do a class research project in conjunction with Normal School District Unit #5’s Diversity Action Council. The school board and DAC want to investigate perceptions of current school efforts in K-12 schools for implementing diversity curriculum and addressing diversity issues in testing, in representation (on faculties, school board, etc.), and in family-, gifted education, and extracurricular  involvement. You have broad permission to talk to anyone you need to within the school context.

 

NOTES/Questions for Exercise

How would you characterize the qualitative interview? How might this differ from a "standardized interview" used in either the organizational sector (job interview) or in traditional scientific studies?

 

What would be the benefits of using an interview. Specifically, when might you use an interview over some other qualitative method? What are some limitations of the interview?

 

Be ready to describe the characterizing features of--and differences between--five different types of interviews.

 

PRAGMATICS OF THE INTERVIEW

What about power relationships in the interview?

How do you choose good interviewees?

How do you establish rapport?

What are different types of questions you might ask?

What about lies--how can you detect them and what can you do about them?

 

What does the McCracken reading have to add to Lindlof and Taylor's discussion?

 

In class, we may choose a topic, develop interview questions, and do some mock interviews! :)

 

Why Interview? (Lindlof & Taylor)

--why interviews over observation?

--why interviews over open-ended questionnaires?

--how different from an everyday conversation?

 

Specific Objectives

--What claims can you make? What kind of data do you get?

--What is the difference between accounts and explanations?

Explain each. For example, how would one "infer comm properties"

     How might one use Iw's to "elicit distinctive language"

Which of the purposes (more than one?) do you seek to serve in your study?

 

HOW TO!

Types of Interviews

·        Ethnographic Interviews

·        Informant Interviews

·        Respondent Interviews

·        Narrative Interviews

·        Focus Group Interviews

 

Understanding the types

·        content comparability

·        depth and range of topics

·        kind of discourse

·        length and number of interviews for each participant

·        sample characteristics

·        Add: way the data is handled (e.g., cases versus categories)

Which type will you use, and why

How does the form of the interview help create the "social reality" of the interview? (status, questioning, interviewer's context affects)

What does Lindlof mean by calling an interview a "form of play"? Why would one do this?

 

How do you do it?

Sample?

·        choosing interviewees

 

Rapport: How gain?

 

To tape, or not to tape? (depends on purposes)

 

Process: (4 steps): From McCracken (1988)

Stage 1: Review of analytic categories and interview design (review of lit)

Stage 2: Review of cultural categories and interview design (personal analysis, cultural analysis)

Stage 3: Discovery of cultural categories & interview (interviews)

Stage 4: Discovery of analytic categories & analysis / write-up

 

Interview Format

Types of Questions?

q  basic questions (a la various sources)

--grand-tour questions (ideal-typical, memorable story tour)

--probes (indirect: eyebrow flash, pause, repeat key words, tell me more..)

--experience questions, example questions

--motive questions

--native-language questions

--auto-driving questions

--posing the ideal

--structural question

--contrast question

--posing emergent ideas (member check)

--devil's advocate question

--highly sensitive question

--loose ends questions

 

q  interviewing by comment (Snow, Zurcher, & Sjoberg, 1982)

 

q  semantic categories [using data-analysis to drive interviews…]

How might you use Spradley’s semantic categories to develop interview Q’s?

 

Lies, evasions, misstatements, inaccuracies, ignorance…

How can you tell?

What do you do?

 

In SUM:  A series of choices:

Interview Process:

1) purposes of the interview (dictate number, depth, etc.)

2) structure of the interview

3) role of prior information: "human instrument" versus "bracketing"

 

Analysis Process: Some different perspectives

A.   Lindlof & Taylor

1) level of interpretation (reporting versus critiquing)

2) data reduction: (themes, pieces, cases) & "self" of the participants

B.  Dramaturgical Focus (Berg, 1989).

C.  Overarching narrative (Sue Jones): https://www.mlb.ilstu.edu/ereserve2/viewpdf.php?filename=JBCOMJON.PDF