ECO 240 Course Web site graphic
Previous page.link to main page.Next page.

Page Links

Tutorial 6: Consumer and Market Demand

 

One of the principle reasons for studying the consumer choice model is to discover what it tells us about the shape of an individual consumer's demand curve. After all, we can use the consumer choice model to vary the price of a good and watch what happens to the quantity of that good consumed. Well, that's all the information we need to construct a demand schedule -- two prices and the associated quantities demanded.

 

Individual Demand

Let's manipulate the consumer choice model and see how we can generate an individual consumer's demand curve. Figure 1 below shows the consumer choice model, with food and clothing as the two goods, where Pf = $2 per unit, Pc = $2 per unit, and income = $80 per period. The consumer has attained the highest satisfaction possible given her preferences, the prices of the two goods, and her income, with F* = 20 units, C* = 20 units, and u(F*, C*) = 400 "utils".

Figure 1

Graph of indifference curve and budget constraint.

 

From its initial rate of $2 per unit, we'll raise the price of food to $8 per unit. Because the law of demand states that quantity demanded varies inversely with price, cæteris paribus, we must hold the other variables constant. So we'll freeze preferences (i.e., no change in a or b in the utility function), keep PC at $2 per unit, and keep income at $80 per period. Figure 2 below shows the new budget constraint this consumer faces.

Figure 2

Graph showing two budget lines, the new one resulting from an increase in the price of food.

 

Now let the consumer adjust to this new budget reality. In Tutorial 5c we learned that the consumer's objective is to maximize utility subject to a budget constraint. Graphically, this means that the consumer's utility-maximizing choice must meet two conditions:

  1. The market basket chosen must place the consumer on the highest indifference curve attainable;
  2. That same market basket must be located on the budget line (i.e., no "saving").

To reach this objective, the consumer chooses a combination of the two goods such that the budget line and indifference curve are tangent.

Figure 3 shows the result. Drawing a new indifference curve (U1) just tangent to the new budget constraint (B1) shows the consumer's new optimum choice of food (F* = 5 units) and clothing (C* = 20 units), with U1(F*, C*) = 200 "utils".

Figure 3

Graph showing new, lower, indifference curve tangent to the new budget line.

 

We now have just enough information to derive the consumer's individual demand curve. Table 1 summarizes this information.


Table 1

Pf

QfD

u(F*, C*)

PC

Income

Pref's
a & b

$2/unit

20 units/t

400 "utils"

$2/unit

$80/pd

0.5

0.5

$8/unit

5 units/t

200 "utils"

$2/unit

$80/pd

0.5

0.5

 

Draw a graph with Price on the vertical axis (in $/unit) and quantity on the horizontal axis (units of food/t).

  1. Plot the first price-quantity combination (Pf = $2/unit and Qfd = 20 units/t).
  2. Plot the second price-quantity combination (Pf = $8/unit and Qfd = 5 units/t).
  3. Connect the two points and you have a line representing the consumer's demand for food!

Your graph should look like the one in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Graph of individual consumer's demand curve.

 

Let's examine the properties of this demand line.

  1. An increase in price, P, from $2 to $8 per unit, causes a decrease in the quantity demanded, Q, from 20 to 5 units per time period. Similarly, a decrease in price would cause an increase in the quantity demanded.
  2. The level of utility that can be attained changes as we move along the demand curve -- an increase in P (from $2 to $8) causes a decrease in the maximum indifference curve attainable, which implies a decrease in satisfaction (from 400 "utils" to 200 "utils"). Similarly, a decrease in P causes an increase in the maximum indifference curve attainable, which implies an increase in satisfaction.
  3. At every point on the consumer's demand curve, the consumer is maximizing U by satisfying the condition that MRS - Px/Py = 0, subject to the constraint that Income = Px*X + Py*Y.

There are two implications that may be derived from this last point.

  • The MRS varies along D (the relative value of Food falls as one buys more).
  • How much one is willing to pay for a good varies along an individual's demand curve(the more Food one has the less one is willing to pay for another unit of it), i.e., the consumer's reservation price falls as the quantity already consumed per period increases.